While many are more than willing to take the drug tests, there are also quite a few who are very reluctant toward this new qualification. This example shows the potential of savings for the government and taxpayers and also more available funds to the ones really in need. If so, after how much allotted time? Last semester, I studied abroad in Jerusalem, Israel. The main objective is denying people assistance because of testing positive for drugs. Until you've walked in anothers shoes you cannot judge or even have a relevant opinion.
There are many concerns surrounding the issue of drug testing welfare recipients, including the cost, constitutionality… 1613 Words 7 Pages time-welfare reform. And also, we want to give people an incentive to not use drugs. People need a hand up not a hand out. As a patient, I have waited up to 3 months for an appt with a social worker, and 60 days more to see a shrink and receive meds, if you have Medicaid. If there is something to hide, again, this will only provide an incentive to do what has to be done to become clean. The results have been somewhat anticlimactic, as the number of positive drug test results is lower than the national average.
Only 19 of those 42 applicants completed their tests, and only three of those 15. They need money, food, and a roof over their head too and an addiction is an addiction, its not easy to quit. However, I believe that there are a lot of people on welfare who will pay for their drugs or alcohol without remorse to whether their bills are paid. It's not for you to live like that the rest of your life. The public, in general, supports providing help to those who really need it. As far as applying for welfare goes, in order to receive welfare you will only have to provide one mandatory drug test prior to your approval for assistance. He also expresses reasoning by stating that drug testing… Welfare Recipients Drug Testing Should it be mandatory for welfare recipients to be drug tested? Although drug abuse occurs in every social demographic, it is more likely for someone in the poverty class to be abusing drugs than someone in the wealthier classes.
Producing reliable fact-checking and thorough investigative reporting requires significant resources. Although a number of states proposed the drug testing of welfare applicants and recipients following the Welfare Reform Act of 1996, most of these proposals stalled in state legislatures. They may not even be using the money for drugs, and it's ridiculous to potentially starve children just because their parents are drug users. This is an example of why the test is a deterrent to those who use the money for illegal drugs. The big question is, is it a problem within the welfare system? Testing of these people operates on the assumption that they use the welfare they receive on drugs. Drug testing fails to show the biggest legal substances being abused by people on or off welfare in America, nicotine and alcohol. Supporters of this and similar legislation have proposed that applicants for welfare pay for the drug testing themselves.
In 1935, then President Theodore Roosevelt introduced the Social Security Act. It's clear what's really going on here: some legislators think that poor folks are more likely to abuse drugs -- which is just not true. I guarantee if you ask any poor person if they like being poor or if they chose to be poor the answer would be no. While the idea of drug testing recipients seems like an easy and obvious solution to keep the welfare program from being abused, the facts behind this sort of process are not so compelling. With this line of intervention it can mean that the person is able to get the counseling and substance abuse help that they need in order to turn their life around. With this policy law-abiding citizens are protected and illegal drug users are penalized.
By the end of 2014, 14 states had mandated welfare-related drug testing, and an additional two states enacted similar legislation in 2015. Those in the poverty class are more likely to be spending money on drugs to alleviate the symptoms of their lack of income. Tensions will be high on both sides. A time of need is normally thought of as situational or temporary. However, currently there is proposed legislation reintroducing a similar idea but with a narrower focus, which would require testing only of those formerly convicted of drug crimes. Please call us at our 24 hour, toll-free helpline, 877-345-8494.
One might question their morals before deciding on whether or not they actually need help, and then decide what the right thing to do is. The biggest issue with people having a drug problem is being disqualified from employment for drug abuse. In 1999, Michigan was the first state to implement a suspicionless drug testing policy as a condition for receiving welfare benefits. You ignorant people who think the gov't is trying to oppress the poor. The dependent s would still receive the necessary help.
People with money think that poor people are lazy and choose to be poor. It has been endorsed by Republican presidential primary candidates Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich, and Pennsylvania -- a state with a reputation for running a pretty tight ship when it comes to eligibility screening -- is experimenting with random testing of some public assistance recipients, individuals who've been convicted of a felony in the past five years. Substance abuse would sever aid. In Michigan, only 8% out of 268 people tested positive. But I don't because I want to keep my job. Pros It is possible that the risk of losing welfare benefits would result in fewer people using drugs. On the macroeconomic side, drug addiction costs society lots of money, especially in the areas of health care, law enforcement and corrections.
The journals and articles used to determine whether drug testing is necessary or a hindrance to public assistance applicants, recipients and the government vary in their argument on the effects of those who receive assistance. But not everyone has good morals or even questions them when certain instances present themselves. Many of the taxpayers are all for this process, though. Drug tests would ensure that this level of responsible behavior is upheld by those receiving assistance. Respectfully, A Christian and Military Veteran, that grew up poor, knows he is not perfect, and has compassion for those in need. Drug testing for individuals applying for government cash assistance should be mandatory before assistance is granted.